Frameworks

Methods for institutional diagnosis.

Each framework defines the problem, workflow, evidence requirements, outputs, limitations and potential applications.

GRF / PUBLIC FRAMEWORK 2026

Governance Resilience Framework

An integrated governance model for institutional learning and economic resilience.

Conceptual & applied researchEmpirical validation pendingEnglish35 pages

The framework examines how governance quality, compliance systems, protected reporting, institutional learning and adaptive capacity may interact with stakeholder confidence and economic continuity.

Workflow and evidence

Frozen evidence → construct classification → evidence sufficiency → graded coding → transition test → competing explanation → break condition → independent outcome → bounded conclusion.

Limitation. GRF is not a certification standard, legal determination, audit opinion, credit or investment rating, insolvency prediction model, or proof of causality. Proposed transmission relationships require independent empirical validation.

Read the framework

DKI-O / JUDICIAL INTEGRITY

Dual control of the judicial record and decision

I-SIGURNOST examines integrity of the procedural and documentary record. MEAID-D examines whether the analytical path from sources and evidence to the decision can be independently reconstructed.

SourceEvidenceFactLegal / normative criterionReasoningConclusionDecision
Limitation. The model does not replace a court, an appeal or judicial independence. It tests documentary and analytical verifiability.

GAP-BRIDGE / REFORM ACCOUNTABILITY

Functional responsibility architecture

A model for connecting reform obligations to named functions, evidence-bearing indicators, deadlines, verification, corrective action and outcomes. RACI mapping separates who is responsible, accountable, consulted and informed.

ProblemArchitectureOutput
Tick-box compliance without demonstrated effectObligation → owner → indicator → evidence → verificationGap register and corrective-action map
Diffuse or displaced responsibilityFunctional responsibility and RACI controlsExplicit ownership and escalation path
Status. This is a policy and monitoring architecture. It is not presented as adopted government or EU policy.